>>> On 27.06.16 at 10:17, <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 24.06.16 at 07:51, <quan...@intel.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ats.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ats.c
>> @@ -22,26 +22,34 @@ LIST_HEAD(ats_devices);
>> bool_t __read_mostly ats_enabled = 0;
>> boolean_param("ats", ats_enabled);
>>
>> -int enable_ats_device(int seg, int bus, int devfn, const void *iommu)
>> +int enable_ats_device(const void *iommu, struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>
> Is there anything preventing the second parameter to become
> a pointer to const too? Afaict that would in turn eliminate the
> need for some of the changes further up.
I just figured that patch 6 depends on this being non-const.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
