On 20/06/16 13:52, Jan Beulich wrote: > +/* > + * Note that this value is effectively part of the ABI, even if we don't need > + * to make it a formal part of it. Hence this value may only be changed if > + * accompanied by a suitable interface version increase. > + */ > +#define HVMCTL_iter_shift 8 > +#define HVMCTL_iter_mask ((1U << HVMCTL_iter_shift) - 1) > +#define HVMCTL_iter_max (1U << (16 + HVMCTL_iter_shift))
This (mis)use of the cmd parameter is surely no longer necessary, given that there is space in xen_hvmctl_t to encode continuation information? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
