>>> On 20.06.16 at 16:32, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 15/06/16 11:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -1358,6 +1358,24 @@ static void time_calibration(void *unuse
>> &r, 1);
>> }
>>
>> +void __init clear_tsc_cap(unsigned int feature)
>> +{
>> + void (*rendezvous_fn)(void *) = time_calibration_std_rendezvous;
>
> This should read time_calibration_rendezvous_fn rather than assuming
> time_calibration_std_rendezvous.
>
> Otherwise, there is a risk that it could be reset back to
> time_calibration_std_rendezvous.
But that's the purpose: We may need to switch back.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
