On 06/17/2016 02:00 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 16.06.16 at 18:49, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 05:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> The IO-APIC address has variable bits determined by the PCI-to-ISA >>> bridge, and the IO-APIC version should be read from the IO-APIC. (Note >>> that there's still implicit rather than explicit agreement on the >>> IO-APIC base address between qemu and the hypervisor.) >> It probably doesn't matter now for PVHv2 since we are not going to >> initially emulate IOAPIC but when/if we do, how do we query for base >> address and version? Should we just rely on the same implicit agreement? > If this refers to the sentence in parentheses, then this was really > meant to indicate a work item. I.e. qemu should negotiate with > Xen. For PVHv2 this would then probably mean for hvmloader to > query Xen (via new hypercall).
We are not using hvmloader for PVH so I am not sure how that would work. You mean the toolstack? -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
