On 6/17/2016 11:55 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello,
On 16/06/16 15:08, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index d31f821..ba248c8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <xen/errno.h>
#include <xen/bitops.h>
#include <xen/grant_table.h>
+#include <xen/vm_event.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/event.h>
@@ -251,6 +252,8 @@ static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev)
ctxt_switch_to(current);
+ vm_event_vcpu_enter(current);
+
local_irq_enable();
context_saved(prev);
@@ -296,7 +299,7 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct
vcpu *next)
void continue_running(struct vcpu *same)
{
- /* Nothing to do */
+ vm_event_vcpu_enter(same);
}
void sync_local_execstate(void)
From my understanding of the commit message, vm_event_vcpu_enter
should be called before returning to the guest. The scheduling
functions are not called every-time Xen is returning to the guest. So
if you want to do every time Xen is re-entering to the guest, then
this should be done in leave_hypervisor_tail.
Regards,
Which is also done, vm_event_vcpu_enter is called from
leave_hypervisor_tail as well.
Are you saying that calling from leave_hypervisor_tail is enough and
that the schedule_tail call is not necessary?
Thanks,
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
