On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Shannon,
> 
> On 17/06/16 04:29, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> > On 2016/6/6 19:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > ACPI tables for ARM guests should be user configurable: acpi=1 in the VM
> > > config file enables them, with default off.
> > While the configuration "acpi" already exists for HVM guest
> > configuration, do we plan to reuse it or use a new name, e.g. arm_acpi?
> 
> We always try to re-use options unless their meaning are completely different.
 
I agree. "acpi" is a good name for it. I would avoid introducing
something like "arm_acpi".

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to