On 2016/6/16 19:20, Wei Liu wrote: > I've read this sub-thread and the other thread in which Boris replied, I > think due to the fact that libxl has more information at hand and libxc > is intended to be simple, I think having the building code in libxl > makes sense. > > Shannon, Boris and Julien, what do you guys think? Can we agree on > something so that Shannon can move on with next iteration? I agree with this and will work on the next version of this series.
Thanks, -- Shannon _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
