> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:16 PM > > On June 15, 2016 3:45 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > >>> On 15.06.16 at 03:54, <quan...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Jan, > > > Could you help me review patch 7? Thanks. > > > Then, I can send out next v9 soon and get started to focus on next > > > patch set. > > > > That patch is fine now from my pov, feel free to stick my R-b on it. > > I actually have it queued for committing already, pending an ARM ack for > > patch 4 (which is why yesterday I committed only the first three patches of > > that series); I didn't check yet which other acks may still be missing on > > later > > patches, everything up to patch 8 is ready to go in afaic, pending all > > necessary > > acks are in place. > > > > Jan, > thanks very much!! > For patch 4, I will ping arm maintainer in that email. > > > > Kevin, > For patch 9, could you help me review it? With your reply of > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-06/msg01842.html , > there is no issue doing so based on spec. I think what I do is changing ' > iommu_rc / > iommu_ret ' to ' context_rc / iotlb_rc '. > in this case, I wonder whether this can be fixed upon commit, then I am no > need to send > out v9. >
Yes, no more comments except the naming: Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
