Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: correct xl cpupool-numa-split
with vcpu limited dom0"):
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:01:50AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 06:30 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > When trying to use xl cpupool-numa-split and dom0 is limited to less
> > > vcpus than one numa node the operation will fail.
> > >
> > > Correct this by allowing this configuration.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Glenn Enright <gl...@rimuhosting.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
> > >
> > Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
>
> I think this is also a backport candidate?
Possibly.
I looked at the code for a minute or two, and perhaps I'm being dense
this morning, but I wasn't able to see (from the code and the commit
message and from the diff) precisely what misunderstanding the
original author of the code had, and how this patch fixes it.
I don't want to backport (non-security) things unless they have a very
low chance of regressions. So perhaps someone could either explain it
to me, or assert convincingly that they are sure it's right :-).
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
