On 06/03/16 01:52, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> The return value has not been clearly defined, with the function
> never returning 0 which seemingly indicated a condition where the
> guest should crash. In this patch we define -rc as error condition
> where the notification was not sent, 0 where the notification was sent
> and the vCPU is not paused and 1 that the notification was sent and
> that the vCPU is paused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com>
> ---
> Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
> Cc: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c   | 4 ++--
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
>  xen/common/vm_event.c      | 5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to