On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 16:23 +0800, He Chen wrote: > As Andrew said, CLOS is currently managed per-domain in Xen and it > works > well so far. So in initial design, I am inclined to continue this > behavior (per-socket) to L2 CAT to keep the consistency between L2 > and > L3 CAT. Any thoughts? > FWIW, I think this is fine. If at some point we'll want something different, we can always extend.
Perhaps, let's keep this (the fact that we may want to make things more fine grained) in mind when designing the interface. Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
