I'm still not very clear why would do_altp2m_op change the domain to
current domain (which is dom0 in my case) when the cmd is
HVMOP_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify
<http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;hb=743289d0296268fe6bad64531a24d8053afeb062#l6198>.
As to my case, it would prevent the dom0 to set the #ve info page for other
domUs because the check of is_hvm_domain would fail
<http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;hb=743289d0296268fe6bad64531a24d8053afeb062#l6204>and
the function will returns directly.

2016-05-12 0:26 GMT+08:00 Sahita, Ravi <ravi.sah...@intel.com>:

> Hi Fangtuo,
>
>
>
> #VE can be setup to be delivered to any dom that is a HVM.
>
>
>
> Ravi
>
>
>
> *From:* Big Strong [mailto:fangtu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 11, 2016 8:38 AM
> *To:* Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> *Cc:* Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.k.leng...@gmail.com>; Sahita, Ravi <
> ravi.sah...@intel.com>; Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Xen-devel] xc_altp2m_set_vcpu_enable_notify fail
>
>
>
> Is that a bug or does #ve info page can only exist on dom0? If this is
> true, why would there be a is_hvm_domain check which will stop the
> execution of xc_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify?
>
>
>
> 2016-05-11 15:56 GMT+08:00 Big Strong <fangtu...@gmail.com>:
>
> From what I analyzed, can I draw a concolusion that the current
> implementation of do_altp2m_op means #ve info page can only be set on dom0
> memory and the dom0 must be a hvm? This seems like ridiculous as dom0 is a
> special pv guest.
>
>
>
> 2016-05-11 11:37 GMT+08:00 Big Strong <fangtu...@gmail.com>:
>
> Further debugging shows that the domain is changed to domain 0 during the
> check of whether the cmd of do_altp2m_op
> is HVMOP_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify, located at here
> <http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=615fa8908375aaad452e2be69fe183c2a12b82bf;hb=b24ad7ba911a9f0688ab179736476e44c52144f1#l6198>.
> As domain 0 is a pv guest, it causes the is_hvm_domain
> <http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=615fa8908375aaad452e2be69fe183c2a12b82bf;hb=b24ad7ba911a9f0688ab179736476e44c52144f1#l6204>
> check failed, and thus the execution never goes to
> HVMOP_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify
> <http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=615fa8908375aaad452e2be69fe183c2a12b82bf;hb=b24ad7ba911a9f0688ab179736476e44c52144f1#l6267>,
> which in the end cause xc_altp2m_set_vcpu_enable_notify fail. Why would *the
> logic of do_altp2m_op change the domain to dom0 when the cmd of
> do_altp2m_op is HVMOP_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify*?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, after adding printk to all the routines
> of xc_altp2m_set_vcpu_enable_notify, it turns out that the problem is
> because* the check of is_hvm_domain()
> <http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=615fa8908375aaad452e2be69fe183c2a12b82bf;hb=b24ad7ba911a9f0688ab179736476e44c52144f1#l6204>
> failed* in function do_altp2m_op()
> <http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=615fa8908375aaad452e2be69fe183c2a12b82bf;hb=b24ad7ba911a9f0688ab179736476e44c52144f1#l6179>.
> However, I've already configure the VM to build as a HVM by adding option
> "builder=hvm" in the config file, but for unknown reason the .printk of
> domain->type is guest_type_pv. I've tried both windows and linux as the
> guest VM, both failed for the same reason. Any ideas?
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to