>>> On 29.04.16 at 16:21, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
> FreeBSD linker sets the OS ABI to ELFOSABI_FREEBSD, but the payload can
> still be loaded without issues.
> 
> All the ELF OS ABIs follow the System V calling convention, and the OS ABI
> doesn't really matter because Xen is a standalone kernel.

Well, first of all our name is wrong. The correct one is
ELFOSABI_NONE, as I did also write in one of the xSplice patch
reviews. And this _is_ the correct thing to expect here, as other
settings may imply behavioral changes. If other ABIs are also
fine, they can be added, but we can't ignore that field.

Jan

> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> ---
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
> Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerw...@citrix.com>
> ---
>  xen/common/xsplice_elf.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/common/xsplice_elf.c b/xen/common/xsplice_elf.c
> index e403a0e..de68d29 100644
> --- a/xen/common/xsplice_elf.c
> +++ b/xen/common/xsplice_elf.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ static int xsplice_header_check(const struct xsplice_elf 
> *elf)
>      if ( hdr->e_version != EV_CURRENT ||
>           hdr->e_ident[EI_VERSION] != EV_CURRENT ||
>           hdr->e_ident[EI_ABIVERSION] != 0 ||
> -         hdr->e_ident[EI_OSABI] != ELFOSABI_SYSV ||
>           hdr->e_type != ET_REL ||
>           hdr->e_phnum != 0 )
>      {
> -- 
> 2.6.4 (Apple Git-63)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org 
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to