Hi Jan,
On 25/04/16 12:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.04.16 at 16:00, <quan...@intel.com> wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
@@ -2540,7 +2540,7 @@ static int force_stage = 2;
*/
static u32 platform_features = ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK;
-static void arm_smmu_iotlb_flush_all(struct domain *d)
+static int arm_smmu_iotlb_flush_all(struct domain *d)
{
struct arm_smmu_xen_domain *smmu_domain =
domain_hvm_iommu(d)->arch.priv;
struct iommu_domain *cfg;
@@ -2557,13 +2557,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_iotlb_flush_all(struct domain *d)
arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(cfg->priv);
}
spin_unlock(&smmu_domain->lock);
+
+ return 0;
}
Even if indentation looks inconsistent in this file, please make your
addition match surrounding code.
The file smmu.c was imported from Linux and supposed to use only Linux
coding style. This is in order to help porting fixes.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
