On 04/25/2016 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.04.16 at 20:06, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:18:48PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 04/13/2016 10:09 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
snip
+static int xsplice_action(xen_sysctl_xsplice_action_t *action)
+{
+ struct payload *data;
+ char n[XEN_XSPLICE_NAME_SIZE];
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = verify_name(&action->name, n);
+ if ( rc )
+ return rc;
+
+ spin_lock(&payload_lock);
+
+ data = find_payload(n);
+ if ( IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data) )
+ {
+ spin_unlock(&payload_lock);
+
+ if ( !data )
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ return PTR_ERR(data);
+ }
I think you need something like: rc = -EINVAL;
here. Otherwise running "xen-xsplice unload <patch>" on an applied patch
succeeds but fails to do anything.
/me nods. Fixed.
I don't follow: There's no path out of the if()'s body, and a proper
error indicator gets handed to the caller via the two return
statements. Why would this need converting to -EINVAL?
I intended that line to be inserted after the if statement to set a
default return value for the unhandled paths through the following
switch(), not to change the if().
--
Ross Lagerwall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
