>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <kon...@kernel.org> 04/20/16 6:10 PM >>> >> >+.PHONY: xsplice >> >+xsplice: config.h >> >+ # Need to have these done in sequential order >> >+ $(MAKE) -f $(BASEDIR)/Rules.mk xen_hello_world_func.o >> >+ $(MAKE) -f $(BASEDIR)/Rules.mk xen_hello_world.o >> >> Why do these two need doing in order? And why can't $(XSPLICE) not just >> depend >> on its to object files, without needing explict make invocation to generate >> them? > >That is b/c the the xen_hello_world.c depends on the generation of >config.h. > >I _think_ I can do: >xsplice: config.h xen_hello_world_func.o > >As the xen_hello_world_func.c should be able to be built without any >dependencies. > >Or maybe I can do: > >xen_hello_world.o: config.h >$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ >^^^ - copy-n-paste from Rules.mk
But why would you want to duplicate the rule? All you need is representation of the dependency. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
