On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 18:22 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] libxl: print
> message how to recover from xl cpupool-cpu-remove errors"):
> >
> > Not easily (and in general not with any patch that I'd consider
> > appropriate for this phase of the release process), as it depends
> > on
> > transient situations in the hypervisor, such as lock contention on
> > scheduling data structures.
> I think it would be best to carry on this conversation in response to
> my fixup mini-series, which contains a docs patch full of `xxx' :-).
>
Yep, sorry, I've just saw it. I'll reply better tomorrow.Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
