>>> On 31.03.16 at 15:28, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 06:07:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 31.03.16 at 13:43, <kon...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:30:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >>> On 30.03.16 at 17:43, <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >> >> > Since they're all cosmetic, if you take care of all of them, feel free >> >> > to stick my ack on the result. >> >> >> >> Actually - no, please don't. While the patch is fine content wise >> >> then from my perspective, I'm still lacking a convincing argument >> >> of why this new hypercall is needed in the first place. If others >> >> are convinced by the argumentation between (mostly, iirc) you >> >> and Andrew, I'm not going to stand in the way, but I'm also not >> >> going to approve of the code addition without being myself >> >> convinced. >> > >> > Damm. I pushed the patch in yesterday in 'staging'! >> > >> > We can always revert them.. >> > >> > "Others" being other maintainers I presume? >> >> Any one of the REST maintainers, yes. > > Changing the title to get their attention.
Yet nothing has happened, so I think the patch needs to be reverted (at least for the time being). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
