Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] libxl: add support for vscsi"):
> What Ian wanted was that we need clear correlation of xl configuration
> syntax with libxl API fields. For example, for a FOO deviceThanks for explaining, yes. > However, I don't think that can be easily achieved in the case of pvscsi > because we need to support both legacy Xen-classic kernel and new PVOPS > kernel. Olaf, please correct me if I'm wrong. That is unfortunate. Also I am confused, then: if it is not possible to support a sensible semantics (with an appropriate syntax) at the libxl level, how is it possible to do so at the xl level ? (I confess I haven't reread the patch in detail today...) Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
