On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/04/16 13:32, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> > Xen guests do not offline/online CPUs during suspend/resume and
> > therefore FROZEN notifier transitions are not required. Add this
> > explanation as a comment in the code to get not confused why
> > CPU_TASKS_FROZEN masked transitions are not considered.
> >
> > Cc: David Vrabel <david.vra...@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> > Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-ma...@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 6 ++++++
> > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -213,6 +213,12 @@ static int xen_cpu_notification(struct n
> > unsigned long action,
> > void *hcpu)
> > {
> > + /*
> > + * Xen guests do not offline/online CPUs during
> > + * suspend/resume, thus CPU_TASKS_FROZEN masked transitions
> > + * are not considered.
> > + */
>
> This may not be true for arm guests.
ARM guests behave like x86 PV guests in this regard. I expect the
comment to be appropriate for both archs or none.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
