On 04/05/2016 04:26 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.04.16 at 17:22, <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 12:52 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> -static s_time_t read_platform_stime(void)
>>>> +static s_time_t read_platform_stime(u64 *stamp)
>>>> {
>>>> - u64 count;
>>>> + u64 plt_stamp_counter, count;
>>>
>>> "stamp" and "counter" seem kind of redundant.
>>>
>> A bit, perhaps you prefer the latter? There was a variable named "count", so
>> I
>> named "stamp" for clearer distinction between the variables and the output
>> arg.
>
> Between plt_stamp and plt_counter I'd indeed have a slight preference
> towards the latter.
OK, I will fix that.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
