On March 31, 2016 9:50pm, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:21:22AM +0000, Xu, Quan wrote: > > On March 11, 2016 12:53am, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > -build: $(STUBDOMPATH) > > > +build: $(STUBDOM_BUILD) > > > > Wei, > > in original code, in stubdom/vtpm and stubdom/vtpmmgr, the code style is > > inconsistent and ugly. > I personally prefer small patches in a series, but I don't object to having > large > patch(es) either.
ok. I think so too. It may be one file per patch. > At the end of the day, I think Daniel's opinion matters most. > After a plan is agreed upon, you can then provide a branch for us to pull in. I think I am not authorized to branch, could you provide a branch and tell me how to commit to that branch? Sorry, I am unfamiliar with the upstream process. > Note > that upstream don't test vtpm in any fashion so you do need to run your tests. > I will test it. I think I hope Daniel could help my patches. btw, I have made a quick patch to fix the seal/unseal issue. I will send out later. > The only thing that matters to me is that when you will do it -- you will > need to > patch a different tree after I split off stubdom. In order to minimise the > fuss one > of us will need to wait for the other. > Once you have done, please let me know. Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
