Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Please use on init paths boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) and on fast
> paths static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT). No more of that cpu_has_XXX
> ugliness.

Replace the use of cpu_has_pat on init paths with boot_cpu_has().

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Cc: Robert Elliott <elli...@hpe.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index 3c08a27..3aea1ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat)
 {
        u64 tmp_pat;
 
-       if (!cpu_has_pat) {
+       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) {
                pat_disable("PAT not supported by CPU.");
                return;
        }
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat)
 
 static void pat_ap_init(u64 pat)
 {
-       if (!cpu_has_pat) {
+       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) {
                /*
                 * If this happens we are on a secondary CPU, but switched to
                 * PAT on the boot CPU. We have no way to undo PAT.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to