>>> On 16.03.16 at 15:21, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > v2: > - Move to per-pcpu ipi mask. > - Use smp_send_event_check_mask() to IPI rather than flush_tlb_mask(). > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 12 ------------ > xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c | 19 ++++++------------- > xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/viridian.h | 4 ---- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Quite nice for a bug fix. > @@ -656,7 +647,9 @@ int viridian_hypercall(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > * so we may unnecessarily IPI some CPUs. > */ > if ( !cpumask_empty(pcpu_mask) ) > - flush_tlb_mask(pcpu_mask); > + smp_send_event_check_mask(pcpu_mask); > + > + output.rep_complete = input.rep_count; Questions on this one remain: Why only for this hypercall? And what does "repeat count" mean in this context? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
