On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 18:09 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > While fiddling with the Cc-list, can you please try to arrange things > in such a way that each person is Cc-ed only to the subset of the > series that he would reasonably care about. > > For instance, Jan is likely not going to look at libxl and xl stuff, > so > no need bothering him with that. Similarly, IanJ wouldn't probably > look > at hypervisor stuff. > > If you are in doubt, stick to MAINTAINERS, with the exception that, > if > some random person commented on vX, he should be Cc-ed to vX+1, where > the comments are addressed, no matter what he/she maintains. > > There are other exceptions, actually. For example, it's ok to Cc me > to > the whole series. This is hard to "set in stone", so again, if in > doubt, follow the rule above... If people are interested in a patch > that they happen not to be Cc-ed to, they'll find it via the mailing > list. > To be fair, you are actually doing this already, and it was me that had the wrong impression that you weren't.
So, good work with that, and sorry (you and everyone else) for the noise on this. :-) Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
