On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:32 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/03/16 18:28, Paul Sujkov wrote: > > Regarding ARM build, I'm using xenalyze as both host tool (x86 > > build, e.g. for gnuplot scatterplot graphs) and target tool (ARM, > > for fast summary check); but since we're working with Xen 4.5, I'm > > building it outside Xen source tree with a custom Makefile. > > xenalyse should be able to be run as a separate tool, and on a > different architecture. All it does is annotate the binary trace > file. > It sure should. However, I would not expect the ARM binary, built when building of the tools for ARM, to work on an x86 box (either dom0, devbox, or whatever). That's what I think Ben was asking about, and what I was responding to.
> I don't think there is much change between what's now in-tree and > what was out of tree in the 4.5 timeframe. > Apart from my recent enhancement in events displaying, I'm quite sure I remember Coverity uncovering something pretty important about how some stats were being handled, and that being fixed not more that a couple of weeks ago. Ah, here it is: ebdba150bff1d914805d60efa576337bbef0c305 Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
