>>> On 02.03.16 at 15:07, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jan >> Beulich >> Sent: 02 March 2016 13:33 >> To: George Dunlap >> Cc: xen-devel; Wei Liu >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.7 Development Update >> >> >>> On 02.03.16 at 12:38, <dunl...@umich.edu> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> * Improve ioreq server performance >> >> - Yu Zhang >> >> - Paul Durrant >> > >> > If this means "use RB trees for rangesets", I think this is already in. >> >> No, it's not. There was no point in committing that one without >> the patch actually needing it. >> > > Using RB trees vs. a linear walk is still an improvement so I see no harm in > committing it.
But the individual nodes (and hence the overall resource use) grow, and whether that is worth the presumably tiny win on lookups I'm not at all certain. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
