On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 11:04 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 16/02/16 18:11, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > by doing the following two things:
> >
> > - move TRC_SCHED_DOM_{ADD,REM}, into the functions
> > that do the actual scheduling-related domain
> > initialization;
> >
> > - add two 'generic' DOM_{ADD,REM} events. They're
> > made part of the TRC_DOM0 tracing class, as Dom0
> > is, usually, from where domains are created and
> > destroyed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com>
>
> Since this changes domain.c, I guess this would need an ack from "The
> Rest" -- probably either from Jan or Ian, since they're somewhat
> familiar with this code...?
>
Ping (Ian, Jan)?
Also, George, I haven't seen any comment from you on patch 16 ("PATCH
v2 16/16] xenalyze: handle DOM0 operaions events",
<20160216181331.27876.31120.stgit@Solace.station> )... Is that because
you want to see others' opinion on this patch first?
As far as I can tell, these two patches (i.e., 03/16 and 16/16) is all
that is preventing this series to be checked in (with the exception of
patch 15, which I'll resend as part of another, follow-up, series, as
agreed with George).
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
