On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 15:28 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 16/02/16 18:13, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > ---
> >  tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c |   59
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c b/tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c
> > index 8f97f3a..dd21229 100644
> > --- a/tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c
> > +++ b/tools/xentrace/xenalyze.c
> > @@ -7828,6 +7828,65 @@ void sched_process(struct pcpu_info *p)
> >                         r->rq_avgload, r->b_avgload);
> >              }
> >              break;
> > +        /* RTDS (TRC_RTDS_xxx) */
> > +        case TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 1): /* TICKLE           */
> > +            if(opt.dump_all) {
> > +                struct {
> > +                    unsigned int cpu:16;
> > +                } *r = (typeof(r))ri->d;
> > +
> > +                printf(" %s rtds:runq_tickle cpu %u\n",
> > +                       ri->dump_header, r->cpu);
> > +            }
> > +            break;
> > +        case TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 2): /* RUNQ_PICK        */
> > +            if(opt.dump_all) {
> > +                struct {
> > +                    unsigned int vcpuid:16, domid:16;
> > +                    unsigned int cur_dl_lo, cur_dl_hi;
> > +                    unsigned int cur_bg_lo, cur_bg_hi;
> > +                } *r = (typeof(r))ri->d;
> > +                uint64_t dl = (((uint64_t)r->cur_dl_hi) << 32) +
> > r->cur_dl_lo;
> > +                uint64_t bg = (((uint64_t)r->cur_bg_hi) << 32) +
> > r->cur_bg_lo;
> 
> Why are you doing this, instead of just using uint64_t?
> 
It was to make the struct in sched_rt.c and here exactly match, for
ease of someone reading both the pieces of code at the same time, to
understand what's being printed.

However, yes, using uint64_t is probably equally understandable, and
more readable in case one only look at this code, so I can change this
(and resend).

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to