>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h > @@ -574,6 +574,34 @@ void microcode_set_module(unsigned int); > int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void), unsigned long len); > int microcode_resume_cpu(unsigned int cpu); > > +#define LCAP_faulting (1U << 0) > +#define LCAP_1cd (3U << 1) > +#define LCAP_e1cd (3U << 3) > +#define LCAP_Da1 (1U << 5) > +#define LCAP_6c (1U << 6) > +#define LCAP_7ab0 (3U << 7)
I guess the cases where the mask has two set bits is when two CPUID output registers are being controlled, but I don't see what use that pairing is going to be. But with the patch supposedly going to make sense only in the context of the following ones, I'll see (and I'd presumably be able to ack this one then also only when having seen the others). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
