>>> On 16.02.16 at 07:58, <kevin.t...@intel.com> wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c >> @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static void vmx_vmcs_save(struct vcpu *v, struct >> hvm_hw_cpu >> *c) >> __vmread(GUEST_SYSENTER_CS, &c->sysenter_cs); >> __vmread(GUEST_SYSENTER_ESP, &c->sysenter_esp); >> __vmread(GUEST_SYSENTER_EIP, &c->sysenter_eip); >> + __vmread(GUEST_DR7, &c->dr7); >> > > Hi, Tamas, I didn't see the open closed around "v != current", if > I'm not missing some mails... Have you confirmed with Jan that > he is OK with it?
We didn't really settle on this yet. I'm not heavily opposed to it remaining unconditional for now, but as said in the other replay my fear is that this might later lead to further additions which may then also be of no interest to the main (save/migration) user of this code. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
