On 2/9/2016 1:03 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
X86-side hvm.c is @ arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c. To maintain arm<->x86 symmetry,
also move arch/arm/hvm.c to arch/arm/hvm/hvm.c.
Why are we doing this? These are not header files, their paths don't
necessarily need to be the same and xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c is very
different from xen/arch/arm/hvm.c.
Please state the reason more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 2 +-
xen/arch/arm/hvm.c | 67 -----------------------------------------------
xen/arch/arm/hvm/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/hvm/hvm.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Because the ARM side hvm.c currently exists solely to add an implementation for
do_hvm_op, which on x86 is @ arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c. I presume the ARM hvm.c got
its name
from the X86 file, so I thought a symmetry between the two was intended from
the start.
Also, the hvm directory was created to separate hvm-specific code, which is the
case w/
do_hvm_op on any arch.
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
