On 02/05/2016 08:21 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
When adding a new frontend to xen-scsiback don't decrement the number
of active frontends in case of no error. Not doing so results in a

I think you meant "Doing so".

Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>


failure when trying to remove the xen-pvscsi nexus even if no domain
is using it.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
  drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
index ad4eb10..51387d7 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
@@ -939,12 +939,12 @@ out:
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->v2p_lock, flags);
out_free:
-       mutex_lock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
-       tpg->tv_tpg_fe_count--;
-       mutex_unlock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
-
-       if (err)
+       if (err) {
+               mutex_lock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
+               tpg->tv_tpg_fe_count--;
+               mutex_unlock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
                kfree(new);
+       }
return err;
  }


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to