Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a weekly coverity flight"):
> On 03/02/16 10:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Andy, I presume you deliberately started excluding stubdoms at some point?
> > I think this is probably the right thing to do, at least for now, since
> > stubdoms run with guest privileges so aren't hugely interesting, plus they
> > include an awful lot of third party code which we don't want to be
> > scanning+triaging (especially given how out of date some of the code is).
>
> Correct. That is precisely why I prevented stubdom and etherboot from
> being scanned.
I agree with this reasoning.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
