On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:59 -0500, Elena Ufimtseva wrote: > > Hey Dario > > Please disregard the previous email with topology information. > It was incorrect and I am attaching the topology that is actually > result > of Joao smt patches application. > Ok :-)
Well, this: ... physical id : 0 siblings : 16 core id : 0 cpu cores : 8 ... physical id : 0 siblings : 16 core id : 0 cpu cores : 8 ... physical id : 0 siblings : 16 core id : 1 cpu cores : 8 ... [etc] And this: cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpu*/domain*/names SMT MC SMT MC SMT MC SMT MC [etc] Makes me think that the patch are doing their job, and that the OS is correctly seeing a multicore, SMT-enabled topology. Good work on that! ;-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
