On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 11:08 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> c/s 2d2f789 "tools: rename libxc's evtchn_port_or_error_t with an xc_
> prefix" doesn't cater for older applications which have requested
> XC_WANT_COMPAT_EVTCHN_API

I think we can safely assume that such apps are not also using xenevtchn.h
(otherwise there would be clashes already) so:

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>

> ---
> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
> CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> ---
>  tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h
> b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h
> index dc513a3..93ccadb 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h
> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void *xc_map_foreign_bulk(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t
> dom, int prot,
>  #ifdef XC_WANT_COMPAT_EVTCHN_API
>  
>  typedef struct xenevtchn_handle xc_evtchn;
> +typedef xc_evtchn_port_or_error_t evtchn_port_or_error_t;
>  
>  xc_evtchn *xc_evtchn_open(xentoollog_logger *logger,
>                               unsigned open_flags);

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to