On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 11:08 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > c/s 2d2f789 "tools: rename libxc's evtchn_port_or_error_t with an xc_ > prefix" doesn't cater for older applications which have requested > XC_WANT_COMPAT_EVTCHN_API
I think we can safely assume that such apps are not also using xenevtchn.h (otherwise there would be clashes already) so: > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > --- > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > --- > tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h > b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h > index dc513a3..93ccadb 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h > +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl_compat.h > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void *xc_map_foreign_bulk(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t > dom, int prot, > #ifdef XC_WANT_COMPAT_EVTCHN_API > > typedef struct xenevtchn_handle xc_evtchn; > +typedef xc_evtchn_port_or_error_t evtchn_port_or_error_t; > > xc_evtchn *xc_evtchn_open(xentoollog_logger *logger, > unsigned open_flags); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel