On 25/01/16 10:16, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com> > > The discussion in [1] lead to an agreement of the missing pieces in PVH > (or HVM without a device-model) in order to progress with it's > implementation. > > One of the missing pieces is a new boot ABI, that replaces the PV boot > ABI. The aim of this new boot ABI is to remove the limitations of the > PV boot ABI, that are no longer present when using auto-translated > guests. The new boot protocol should allow to use the same entry point > for both 32bit and 64bit guests, and let the guest choose it's bitness
I would add "and paging mode" here, as it is just as important as bitness. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
