>>> On 18.01.16 at 17:25, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1990,6 +1990,9 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct domain *d, > hvm_domain_context_t *h) > if ( hvm_load_entry_zeroextend(CPU, h, &ctxt) != 0 ) > return -EINVAL; > > + if ( ctxt.pad0 != 0 ) > + return -EINVAL;
Right after I had committed and pushed the patch it occurred to me that this seems to be missing a save side counterpart, which would constitute both an information leak and a functional bug. Would you please take another look? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
