>>> On 18.01.16 at 13:10, <osstest-ad...@xenproject.org> wrote: > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. > 77892 > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. > 77892
Hmm, between all those XSM-related failures I didn't notice that we've acquired an apparent regression here between 20c8f1a8a5 and 7167222b15 (based on this first failing in flight 78129). Oddly enough the respective test-amd64-amd64-* tests don't exhibit the issue, but none of the commits in between seem, at the first glance, to affect 32-bit vs 64-bit Dom0 in different ways. Short of anyone else having an idea, I guess we'll have to wait for a bisect flight to complete. Or wait - isn't the flag field introduction (commit a3b6844d3b) incompatible, in that it fails to also add a 32-bit padding field? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
