Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions -
FAIL [and 2 more messages]"):
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 02:47 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Ugly. Could we live with that until #1 and #2 get put in place?
>
> #1 is trivial (see below).
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
> #2 is, as noted in my original mail, something which while it logically
> belongs between #1 and #3 could be deferred.
>
> > Otherwise it looks very much like reverting the two Kconfig
> > conversion patches is the only possible solution at this point...
>
> IMHO we should apply the patch below + Doug's patch from <1452879580-1770-1
> -git-send-email-car...@cardoe.com> today at the latest.
FR, this latter message is "tools: make FLASK utils build
unconditional".
With these, is osstest going to DTRT ?
My fear is that the appearance of the policy will cause non-XSM builds
to generate an XSM boot entry which will osstest might select. But I
haven't peered at the interlocking bits of code to see what will
happen.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
