On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 03:04 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > - ARM side unimplemented (and hence libxc for now made cope with both > models),
So, one model is the one described in the commit message: > - zero (success, everything done) > - positive (success, this many done, more to do: re-invoke) > - negative (error) What is the other one? I'd expect ARM to already implement a subset of this (i.e. 0 or negative, perhaps with a subset of the possible errno values), which I'd then expect libxc to just cope with without it constituting a second model. IOW I don't think there should be (or indeed is) any special casing of ARM vs x86 here or one model vs another, just a case of one arch only using a subset of the expressibility of the interface. What have I missed? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel