> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 11 January 2016 15:53 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: Ian Campbell; Ian Jackson; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Keir > (Xen.org); Tim (Xen.org) > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] public/io/netif.h: document transmit and receive > wire formats separately > > >>> On 11.01.16 at 16:25, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Currently there is no documented wire format for guest receive-side > > packets but the location of the 'wire format' comment block suggests > > it is the same as transmit-side. This is almost true but there is a > > subtle difference in the use of the 'size' field for the first fragment. > > > > For clarity this patch creates separate comment blocks for receive > > and transmit side packet wire formats, tries to be more clear about the > > distinction between 'fragments' and 'extras', and documents the subtlety > > concerning the size field of the first fragment. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org> > > Cc: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> > > --- > > > > v5: > > - Add extra clarifications. > > Di you perhaps not notice that v4 went in, and hence an incremental > patch would be needed?
Nope, clearly I didn't. I did not see an Acked-by so I didn't check. I'll send v6 with an incremental patch. Paul > > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
