> > You've put the consumer values into the shared page. I'd rather not have > > to scrutinize your shared ring implementation for other security bugs. > > Similarly, if there's another security issues like XSA-155 I'd rather > > not have to look at another non-standard shared ring implementation. > > Ok. That's a good enough reason. I'll come up with a new prototype.
Could I suggest that you make this a more generic one? That is not just limited to network out of band - but other drivers could use it as well. > > > > > IMO, it's you who should be presenting compelling reasons for /not/ > > using the standard infrastructure, not the other way around. > > > > There is no 'standard' here though. There's convention, but that's a > different thing. If we're going to have a 'no more variable size message > protocols' policy than that needs writing down somewhere. > > Paul > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
