On 18/12/15 15:03, Huaitong Han wrote:
> The check needs to be against the xsave header in the area, rather than Xen's
> maximum xfeature_mask. A guest might easily have a smaller xcr0 than the
> maximum Xen is willing to allow, causing the pointer below to be bogus.
>
> The get_xsave_addr() is modified to support uncompressed xstate areas.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huaitong Han <huaitong....@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to