On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcg...@suse.com> > > This lets us annotate its requirements specifically for > PC and lguest subarchitectures. While at it since head.c > just has ebda data rename it. Since we're using linker tables > and both x86 32-bit and 64-bit have them we don't need > to declare a call for this separately. This lets us > also keep this declared static now. > > Since we're using linker tables and have support to annotate > subarchitecture do that instead. pv_legacy() is incorrect as > its really only for legacy PV guests. There's no need for > pv_legacy() check anymore now.
I'm entirely ignorant of anything going on in gPXE/iPXE. Can you explain what a linker table *does*? It looks like all you've done in this patch is to move code around. What actually happens? --Andy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
