On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 16:22 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
> > ---
> > tools/libxc/xc_resume.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_resume.c b/tools/libxc/xc_resume.c
> > index 87d4324..fa16c3e 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_resume.c
> > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_resume.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,24 @@ static int modify_returncode(xc_interface *xch,
> > uint32_t domid)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#elif defined (__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > +
> > +static int modify_returncode(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid)
> > +{
> > + vcpu_guest_context_any_t ctxt;
> > + int rc;
>
>
> Should we call xc_domain_getinfo and check for info.shutdown_reason !=
> SHUTDOWN_suspend, like x86 does?
Yes absolutely, I'd missed that aspect and thought x86 was only looking for
HVM vs PV.
Actually, I bet I can refactor a bunch of this into common code with only a
small arch specific core.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
