>>> On 11.12.15 at 17:56, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> For the original issue here, could the flag be exposed as a
> XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_????

Yes, I think it could, albeit calling this a "capability" or "feature"
seems odd (since really the original behavior was bogus/buggy).
But - with sysctl not being a stable interface, is making qemu use
this actually a good idea? I.e. won't we paint ourselves into the
corner of needing to write compatibility wrappers in qemu
whenever XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo (or its libxc wrapper) changes?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to