>>> On 09.12.15 at 12:02, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 03:53 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> For one the uses of domu_max_order and ptdom_max_order were swapped. > >> And then gcc warns about an unused result of a __must_check function >> in the control part of a conditional expression when both other >> expressions can be determined by the compiler to produce the same value >> (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68039), which happens >> when HAS_PASSTHROUGH is undefined (i.e. for ARM on 4.4 and older). > > Should we issue an updated 158 for all this?
I guess we should, yes. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
