>>> On 03.12.15 at 09:35, <feng...@intel.com> wrote: > VT-d Posted-Interrupts is an enhancement to CPU side Posted-Interrupt. > With VT-d Posted-Interrupts enabled, external interrupts from > direct-assigned devices can be delivered to guests without VMM > intervention when guest is running in non-root mode. > > You can find the VT-d Posted-Interrtups Spec. in the following URL: > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technology/vt- > > directed-io-spec.html > > Feng Wu (17): > r VT-d Posted-intterrupt (PI) design > ra vmx: Suppress posting interrupts when 'SN' is set > r vt-d: Add API to update IRTE when VT-d PI is used > a Update IRTE according to guest interrupt config changes > a vmx: Properly handle notification event when vCPU is running > vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling > ra Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts > > r = has been 'Reviewed-by' > a = has been 'Acked-by'
Actually this kind of summary is misleading (and I understand you're just following what others did before, i.e. this is not a problem just here): For it to be meaningful, one would need to know whether reviews/acks are in place by all necessary maintainers. But of course the summary helps in drawing attention to things completely un-reviewed/un-acked. Perhaps one could use upper case letters to indicate full maintainer review/ack state? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
