>>> On 03.12.15 at 01:36, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: > On 11/30/15 8:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 24.11.15 at 18:51, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: >>> @@ -348,9 +348,9 @@ static XSM_INLINE int >>> xsm_deassign_device(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, uint >>> return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d); >>> } >>> >>> -#endif /* HAS_PASSTHROUGH && HAS_PCI */ >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_PASSTHROUGH && HAS_PCI */ >> >> I don't think fiddling with trailing comments like this one is really >> useful - the connection is clear also without CONFIG_ prefix. > > Most of this series was mechanical early on (e.g. sed). I can > selectively undo updating the comments if that's desirable.
While I agree this makes it more work for you, it would certainly ease review (simply by shrinking the amount of changes to look at). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
